Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Wendy Cheng wrote:
Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
- commit 82d176ba485f2ef049fd303b9e41868667cebbdb
gfs_drop_inode as .drop_inode replacing .put_inode.
.put_inode was called without holding a lock, but .drop_inode
is called under inode_lock held. Might it be a problem?
I was planning to take a look over the weekend .. but this one looks very
promising. Give it a try and let us know !
But - how? .put_inode was eliminated, cannot be used anymore in recent
kernels. And I have no idea what should be changed in gfs_drop_inode.
I see :) ... let me move your tar ball over. Know about cluster IRC
(check cluster wiki for instruction if you don't know how) ? Go there -
maybe some IRC folks will be able to work this with you.
-- Wendy
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
