On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Wendy Cheng wrote: > Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote: > > - commit 82d176ba485f2ef049fd303b9e41868667cebbdb > > gfs_drop_inode as .drop_inode replacing .put_inode. > > .put_inode was called without holding a lock, but .drop_inode > > is called under inode_lock held. Might it be a problem? > > > I was planning to take a look over the weekend .. but this one looks very > promising. Give it a try and let us know ! But - how? .put_inode was eliminated, cannot be used anymore in recent kernels. And I have no idea what should be changed in gfs_drop_inode. Best regards, Jozsef -- E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key: http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address: KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
