ext Jeff Sturm wrote: > We faced the same question, and decided that for reliability, it was > best to add an inexpensive third node to a cluster. > > The third node need not run any cluster services (rgmanager, GFS, CLVM > etc.) other than fencing. This is a far lower cost than adding shared > storage simply for a quorum disk. > > We can figure this solution is a reasonable way. But due to the physical deployment of hardware, it is not a easy way to persuade customer and myself to add a new server but not run any service. it is very odd. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mockey Chen >> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:18 AM >> To: linux clustering >> Subject: How to avoid two-nodes cluster >> split-brain withoutshared storage >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a two node cluster, due to design limitation, there is >> no shared storage exist. So I can not use quorum disk. >> >> Is there any other reliable way to prevent split-brain? >> I searched google, but I can not found any solution suitable >> for my situation. >> >> Any comment is appreciated. >> >> >> Best Regards. >> Chen Ming >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >> >> >> > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
