RE: How to avoid two-nodes cluster split-brain withoutshared storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We faced the same question, and decided that for reliability, it was
best to add an inexpensive third node to a cluster.

The third node need not run any cluster services (rgmanager, GFS, CLVM
etc.) other than fencing.  This is a far lower cost than adding shared
storage simply for a quorum disk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mockey Chen
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:18 AM
> To: linux clustering
> Subject:  How to avoid two-nodes cluster 
> split-brain withoutshared storage
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a two node cluster, due to design limitation, there is 
> no shared storage exist. So I can not use quorum disk.
> 
> Is there any other reliable way to prevent split-brain?
> I searched google, but I can not found any solution suitable 
> for my situation.
> 
> Any comment is appreciated.
> 
> 
> Best Regards.
> Chen Ming
> 
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> 
> 


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux