Does this mean that it should work fine (i.e. no known issues) as a local only file system (one node, with lock_nolock)? -A -- Andrew A. Neuschwander, RHCE Linux Systems/Software Engineer College of Forestry and Conservation The University of Montana http://www.ntsg.umt.edu andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx - 406.243.6310 Kevin Anderson wrote: > For anything prior to the latest Fedora 9/10 kernels and RHEL 5.3, GFS2 > is not considered stable and has known blatant issues with cluster > coherent operations. RHEL 5.3 beta has been released with a working > GFS2. This will move from our tech preview status to supported when RHEL > 5.3 GA version. No one should be running GFS2 in a cluster production > environment prior to these versions. > > Kevin > > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 02:31 +0800, Achievement Chan wrote: >> Dear All, >> Is GFS2 stable for production system? Is it still not defined as >> stable by redhat? >> >> I would like to use it with apache, and courier-imap (Maildir format mailbox) >> >> reagrds, >> Achievement Chan >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
