Re: Is GFS2 stable for production system?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For anything prior to the latest Fedora 9/10 kernels and RHEL 5.3, GFS2
is not considered stable and has known blatant issues with cluster
coherent operations.   RHEL 5.3 beta has been released with a working
GFS2. This will move from our tech preview status to supported when RHEL
5.3 GA version.  No one should be running GFS2 in a cluster production
environment prior to these versions.

Kevin

On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 02:31 +0800, Achievement Chan wrote:
> Dear All,
> Is GFS2 stable for production system? Is it still not defined as
> stable by redhat?
> 
> I would like to use it with apache, and courier-imap (Maildir format mailbox)
> 
> reagrds,
> Achievement Chan
> 
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux