Re: rhcs + gfs performance issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--- On Mon, 10/6/08, Doug Tucker <tuckerd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Doug Tucker <tuckerd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  rhcs + gfs performance issues
> To: "linux clustering" <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Received: Monday, October 6, 2008, 4:05 PM
> > 
> > And reverting back to the Tru64/Alpha system is?
> 
> Nope, completely out of drive space on that one.  I'm
> basically stuck
> where I'm at with it underperforming.

did you check if the standalone NFS server also under perform?

just to rule out the cluster layer in the "under perform" equation

if it is not, then a pasive-active configuration for the cluster could give you what you want, but still using GFS filesystem so you can mount it simultaneous on the demand (for backup).

thanks
roger

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux