On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Federico Simoncelli wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Do you think we should file a bug and continue the discussion there? > > > > Sure. that's also fine by me. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452234 > > As I wrote in the bug description... the solution I proposed (adding a > boot parameter) will also make impossible to start the services > manually later on (until next reboot). This might be why Jozsef was > using the check on a file (which can be easily removed). Jozsef can > you confirm this? Yes, that was the easiest way to make possible to (re)start services without the need to reboot. > Do you think we can find a way to remove this side effect? It could be worked around by adding new command options to the cman/gfs/... init scripts: case "$1" in start) <check boot option> # fall through force-start) # real startup > Is there a way to detect if the init script was run by the init binary > or manually from the shell? I don't know any reliable way to detect it - of course it might be possible. > Should we add an other init command such as "force-start" to override > the boot parameter check? I think the cleanest solution would be to add new command options to the init scripts. Best regards, Jozsef -- E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key: http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address: KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
