Ja S wrote: >>>> If the node doesn't have a local lock on >>>> the resource then it >>>> doesn't "know" it and has to ask the directory >>>> node where it is mastered. > >>> Does it mean even if the node owns the master lock >>> resource but it doesn't have a local lock >>> associated with the master lock resource, it >>> still needs to ask the directory node? > > >> hash tables, hash tables, hash tables ;-) > > Sure. Now I see what do you mean "knows". Thanks. > > Could you please kindly answer my last question above? The answer is "No" ... because it's in the resource hash table. ... see, I told you it was all hash tables ... Chrissie -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
