> >> If the node doesn't have a local lock on
> >> the resource then it
> >> doesn't "know" it and has to ask the directory
> >> node where it is mastered.
> > Does it mean even if the node owns the master lock
> > resource but it doesn't have a local lock
> > associated with the master lock resource, it
> > still needs to ask the directory node?
> hash tables, hash tables, hash tables ;-)
Sure. Now I see what do you mean "knows". Thanks.
Could you please kindly answer my last question above?
Best,
Jas
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
