RE: IP-based tie-breaker on a 2-node cluster?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> but you could also just tune deadnode_timeout to be different on both
> nodes: this results the behaviour Gordan told - the node that has smaller
> deadnode_timeout would fence first.

Would this work in a situation where the switch was down for a few
minutes? Suppose the deadnode_timeout is 30 seconds on one node and 60
seconds on the other. So, after 60 seconds of switch downtime, both nodes
would be trying to fence. If the switch comes up after being down for 5
minutes, they would still immediately fence each other. Or am I not
thinking about this correctly?

-Andrew L

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux