RE: IP-based tie-breaker on a 2-node cluster?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Harri.Paivaniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

What Gordan said is true,

but you could also just tune deadnode_timeout to be different on both nodes: this results the behaviour Gordan told - the node that has smaller deadnode_timeout would fence first.

Now, why didn't I know about this before? Much neater than my hack of putting a different sleep in the two fencing agents. :-)

Thanks.

Gordan

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux