-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gordan Bobic wrote: > What's the point? With enough users, DNS based load balancing works > pretty well. Certainly no worse than LVS. Besides trying a different technology, there was no specific point in using LVS. As I stated in my previous mail, DNS can do the trick very well IMHO (and we actually use DNS round-robin for slave LDAPs) In the directors we host non-mail services for the nodes such as DNS and LDAP, and statistics software as well. > Isn't that a tad redundant with RH cluster's built in resource managemer? Yes. We don't use the other functionalities of Red Hat Cluster Suite, but this could well be considered in order to reuse the two directors as nodes. Thanks for your comments. Jose -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH5muCUWAsjQBcO4IRAtmWAJ986WXwEXIWEYuX+XaYus+s9eC72QCfdasL XZWmOVYpX5tNYYRdEdhSkjI= =HPGV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
