Jose Miguel Parrella Romero wrote:
We use GFS as the shared storage (served via FC) and LVS in order to balance the load between the nodes.
What's the point? With enough users, DNS based load balancing works pretty well. Certainly no worse than LVS.
We also use Heartbeat for high availability of the directors.
Isn't that a tad redundant with RH cluster's built in resource managemer? Gordan -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
