Not sure if this is the "right" answer, but I was also running into this problem on a Gentoo setup. The 2.01.00 package has a gfs-kernel module that (with some simple tweaks to the kernel - see usage.txt) will compile against 2.6.23 and seems to run well. This is my first gfs attempt so I don't know how upgrading the tools will go for you. I also read about (and experienced) problems with gfs2, so I'd also stick with gfs1 for the time being, but at least this way your upgrade path is prepared. Brian Bas van der Vlies <basv@xxxxxxx>: > Hello, > > We are still using gfs1 version 1.0.3 with a 2.6.17 kernel on Debian. I > noticed that there is only one newer version 1.0.4, but that is not working > for us, reported the problem to the list. > > Now i read on the Cluster Project Page to use cvs: > * CVS STABLE branch (compiles against recent kernel.org kernel): > cvs -d :pserver:cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvs/cluster checkout -r STABLE > cluster > > I noticed that there are not many update for STABLE since version 1.0.4 + > which branch must i use to compile againt the latest vanilla kernel > (2.6.23)? > > I still see a lot of messages with do not use gfs2 in a production > environment. That is why we still are using gfs1. > > Regards > > > -- > -- > ******************************************************************** > * * > * Bas van der Vlies e-mail: basv@xxxxxxx * > * SARA - Academic Computing Services phone: +31 20 592 8012 * > * Kruislaan 415 fax: +31 20 6683167 * > * 1098 SJ Amsterdam * > * * > ******************************************************************** > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
