On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 10:36 +0100, Alain Moulle wrote: > Hi Lon > > I've carefully read your last detailed information. I've a > better understanding but something is again not clear for me : > in my two node cluster node1/node2, with quorum disk , without any heuristic, Need a heuristic for now. > I would like to be sure that if there is a failure on the heart-beat > network, only one node fences the other and not both, so : > when I do on node2 ifdown on eth if of heart-beat, what is the > mechanism via the quorum disk that assures that ? > Or how must I configure to assure that ? What does your "heartbeat network" look like? You need a way to tell the difference between "I am alive" and "I am alive but should be dead". In your case, a simple link-detection heuristic would be an easy way to do this - no router / pinging required: no link = "I cannot be the master node" => immediately loses the race. If the heartbeat link isn't available, the node should remove itself. Obviously, this will not work with a crossover cable (both nodes would think they're dead if the link was unplugged). Switches are cheap. Now there are lots of other ways to determine who should win. However, when thinking about this, it is very important that understand that perfect symmetrical splits - i.e. splits where there is absolutely no discernible difference between the nodes - will usually end in a race. Currently, I'm working on a method to enable master-set-wins (e.g. for operation w/o heuristics); I'll post when it's complete. -- Lon -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
