On 9/12/07, Lon Hohberger <
lhh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:05:43AM +0200, Alain Richard wrote:
>
> Le 4 sept. 07 à 23:13, Lon Hohberger a écrit :
>
> >On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:46:50PM +0200, Alain RICHARD wrote:
> >>Perhaps a better error reporting is needed in qdiskd to shows that we
> >>have hit this problem. Also using a generic name like "qdisk device"
> >>when qdiskd is registering its node to cman is a better approach.
> >
> >What about using the label instead of the device name, and restricting
> >the label to 16 chars when advertising to cman?
> Because when using multipath devices (for example a two paths
> device), all the paths and the multi-path device are recognized as
> having the same label, so qdisk fails to get the good device (the
> multi-path device).
I meant implementation-wise, using the label instead of the device name
to solve or work around the 16 character limit when talking to CMAN...
--
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Dave Costakos
mailto:david.costakos@xxxxxxxxx
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
