On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:05:43AM +0200, Alain Richard wrote: > > Le 4 sept. 07 à 23:13, Lon Hohberger a écrit : > > >On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:46:50PM +0200, Alain RICHARD wrote: > >>Perhaps a better error reporting is needed in qdiskd to shows that we > >>have hit this problem. Also using a generic name like "qdisk device" > >>when qdiskd is registering its node to cman is a better approach. > > > >What about using the label instead of the device name, and restricting > >the label to 16 chars when advertising to cman? > Because when using multipath devices (for example a two paths > device), all the paths and the multi-path device are recognized as > having the same label, so qdisk fails to get the good device (the > multi-path device). I meant implementation-wise, using the label instead of the device name to solve or work around the 16 character limit when talking to CMAN... -- Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
