Hi, Does anyone have experience with ocfs2 compared to gfs1 (or gfs2). Are there any news on performance? Kind Regards Kristoffer -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Brieseneck, Arne, VF-Group [mailto:Arne.Brieseneck@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sendt: 4. juni 2007 17:06 Til: linux clustering; Kristoffer Lippert Emne: RE: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: GFS2 problem. Hi David, You know, that GFS1 is slow like hell... I truly can understand Kristoffer when he wants to have GFS2. The throughput is much better. On the other hand Kristoffer could use professional cluster filesystems for PROD systems like Veritas FS. Afaik VFS is also available for RHEL. Arne -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Teigland Sent: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 16:57 To: Kristoffer Lippert Cc: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: GFS2 problem. On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:50:15PM +0200, Kristoffer Lippert wrote: > Hi, > > I've looked at the options, and it seems that building a new kernel is > the only way to go about it. > > RHEL 5.1 is scheduled for okt/nov, and that long we cannot wait. GFS2 is still in preview/beta mode; you shouldn't use it for production purposes yet (regardless of the kernel). Just use GFS(1) instead. Dave -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
