RE: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: GFS2 problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David,

You know, that GFS1 is slow like hell... I truly can understand
Kristoffer when he wants to have GFS2. The throughput is much better.
On the other hand Kristoffer could use professional cluster filesystems
for PROD systems like Veritas FS. Afaik VFS is also available for RHEL.

Arne

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Teigland
Sent: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 16:57
To: Kristoffer Lippert
Cc: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV:  GFS2 problem.

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:50:15PM +0200, Kristoffer Lippert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've looked at the options, and it seems that building a new kernel is

> the only way to go about it.
> 
> RHEL 5.1 is scheduled for okt/nov, and that long we cannot wait.

GFS2 is still in preview/beta mode; you shouldn't use it for production
purposes yet (regardless of the kernel).  Just use GFS(1) instead.

Dave

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux