Hi Robert,
First of all, thanks for your time, I really appreciate it.
I'd like to reply to two separate topics here: first, the objective
of my question and second, the cluster-awareness of MySQL and the use
of GFS with MySQL.
My original question was mainly related to the use of Piranha to
switch over a service (ie, a specific mysql daemon) from one server
to another, in case of fault. There should be only one active service
in the cluster, therefore no concurrency or locking issues should
happen.
The ideal system should be able to:
- have a list of services to launch on the cluster
- identify the node in the cluster suitable to host the service (for
example the node with less workload)
- check the availability of the service
- stop the service on a node (if the service is not already down) and
start the service on another node in case of fault
Fault tolerance in this case will be provided by the ability to
switch the service from one server to another in the cluster.
Scalability is not provided within the service, ie the limitation in
resources for the service consist of the resources available on that
specific server.
I understand that your cluster suite can provide this functionality.
I am mainly looking for a supported set of features for an enterprise
organisation.
The second topic is related to the use of MySQL with clusters and
specifically with GFS. It is what we use to call MySQL in active-
active clustering. I am afraid your documentation is not totally
accurate. Unfortunately, information on the Internet (and also on our
web site) are often contradictory.
It is indeed possible to run multiple mysqld services on different
cluster nodes, all sharing the same data structure on shared storage,
with this configuration:
- Only the MyISAM storage engine can be used
- Each mysqld service must start with the external-locking parameter on
- Each mysqld service hase to have the query cache parameter off
(other cache mechanisms remain on, since they are automatically
invalidated by external locking)
I am afraid this configuration still does not compete against Oracle
RAC. MySQL does not provide a solution that can be compared 1:1 with
RAC. You may find some MySQL implementations much more effective than
RAC for certain environments, as you will certainly find RAC
performing better than MySQL on other implementations.
Based on the experience of the sales engineering team, customers have
never been disappointed by the technology that MySQL can provide as
an alternative to RAC. Decisions are based on many other factors,
such as the introduction of another (or a different) database, the
cost of migrating current applications and compatibility with third
party products. You can imagine we are working hard to remove these
obstacles.
Thanks again for your help,
Kind Regards,
Ivan
--
Ivan Zoratti - Sales Engineering Manager EMEA
MySQL AB - Windsor - UK
Mobile: +44 7866 363 180
ivan@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.mysql.com
--
On 7 Mar 2007, at 18:56, Robert Peterson wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Can someone help out this questioner? I know zip about Cluster.
I looked at the FAQ for a bit and thought that what he wants is
probably doable, but I couldn't tell if it would be easy or
painful to do load-balancing in this particular way. (And I'm not
qualified to say if what he wants is a sensible approach, either.)
regards, tom lane
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:37:17 +0000
From: Ivan Zoratti <ivan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tgl@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Question on RH Cluster from a MySQL Customer
Dear Tom,
first of all, let me introduce myself. I am the Sales Engineering
Manager for EMEA at MySQL. Kath O'Neil, our Director of Strategic
Alliances, kindly gave me your name for a technical question
related to the use of Red Hat and MySQL - hopefully leading to
the adoption of RH Cluster.
Our customer is looking for a solution that could provide high
availability and scalability in a cluster environment based on
linux servers that are connected to a large SAN. Their favourite
choice would be to go with Red Hat.
Each server connected to the SAN would provide resources to host,
let's say, 5 different instances of MySQL (mysqld). Each mysqld
will have its own configuration, datadir, connection port and IP
address.
The clustering software should be able to load-balance new mysqld
instances on the available servers. For example, considering
servers with same specs and workload, when the first mysqld
starts, it will be placed on Server A, the second one will go on
Server B and so on for C,D and E. The sixth mysqld will then go
on A again, then B and so forth. If one of the server fails, the
mysqld(s) is (or are) "moved" on the other servers, still in a
way to guarantee a load- balance of the whole system.
After my long (and hopefully clear enough) explanation, my quick
question is: does RH Cluster provide this kind of features? I am
mostly interested in the way we can instatiate mysqld and re-
launch them on any other server in the cluster in case of fault.
I would be very grateful if you could help me or address me to
somebody or something for an answer.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Kind Regards,
Ivan
--
Ivan Zoratti - Sales Engineering Manager EMEA
MySQL AB - Windsor - UK
Mobile: +44 7866 363 180
ivan@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.mysql.com
Hi Tom, Ivan, and linux-cluster readers,
In theory, our Piranha / LVS (Linux Virtual Server) may be used to
load-balance the requests to numerous mysql servers in a cluster.
Our rgmanager can provide the High Availability to fail over
mysql services to other nodes in the cluster if they fail.
However, if the mysqld daemons are all running on a SAN and you're
mysqld daemons are trying to serve data from the same file system, you
probably have a problem. To share the data/database on the SAN in
one harmonious file system, you could use the GFS file system, but
"regular" mysql is not cluster-aware (to the best of my
knowledge). The sum of my understanding about this may be found here:
http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/faq.html#gfs_mysql
Since Ivan works for mysql, perhaps he can clear this up if
it's not accurate. I'd like to know more about "mysql-cluster"
and how it's implemented. I'd like to see mysql implemented as
a cluster-friendly app using our cluster infrastructure so they
can effectively compete against Oracle RAC without reinventing
the wheel. I'd even like to be a part of the effort to make this
happen. Hope this helps.
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat Cluster Suite
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
