Jon Erickson wrote:
Wendy,
I tried using the ko files from your directory, but I received a
Invalid Symbol message.
i running two separate clusters with the following packages. Can you
create a ko files that will work in these environments to test?
I'm buried in two other urgent issues at this moment so this could take
a while before I can get to it. The best way is for you to contact Red
Hat support if you can.
-- Wendy
Envirorment One x86_64
uname -r = 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
GFS-6.1.6-1
GFS-kernel-smp-2.6.9-60.3
GFS-kernheaders-2.6.9-60.3
Enviroment Two i686
uname -r = 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELhudemem
GFS-kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-49-1.1
GFS-kernheaders.2.6.9-49.1.1
GFS-6.1.5-0
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Jon
On 2/13/07, Wendy Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jon Erickson wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been testing GFS with millions and millions of files and my
> system performance degrades as the number of locks increases. Along
> with the number of locks being in the millions, all of my system
> memory is used. After performing a umount and mount of my GFS file
> system the locks go back down to zero and all the memory is reclaimed.
> This of course improves my system performance. Is there a way to
> release all locks and memory associated without unmounting my file
> system?
>
> Should I try the patch in the bug report?
> Comment #31:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214239
>
Yes, please do. Check out:
http://people.redhat.com/wcheng/Patches/GFS/R4/readme
-- Wendy
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
