Re: DLM Locks and Memory issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wendy,

I tried using the ko files from your directory, but I received a
Invalid Symbol message.

i running two separate clusters with the following packages.  Can you
create a ko files that will work in these environments to test?

Envirorment One  x86_64
uname -r = 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
GFS-6.1.6-1
GFS-kernel-smp-2.6.9-60.3
GFS-kernheaders-2.6.9-60.3

Enviroment Two i686
uname -r = 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELhudemem
GFS-kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-49-1.1
GFS-kernheaders.2.6.9-49.1.1
GFS-6.1.5-0

Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Jon


On 2/13/07, Wendy Cheng <wcheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jon Erickson wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been testing GFS with millions and millions of files and my
> system performance degrades as the number of locks increases.  Along
> with the number of locks being in the millions, all of my system
> memory is used.  After performing a umount and mount of my GFS file
> system the locks go back down to zero and all the memory is reclaimed.
> This of course improves my system performance.  Is there a way to
> release all locks and memory associated without unmounting my file
> system?
>
> Should I try the patch in the bug report?
> Comment #31: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214239
>
Yes, please do.  Check out:

http://people.redhat.com/wcheng/Patches/GFS/R4/readme

-- Wendy

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster



--
Jon

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux