Hi Eftychios; On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:08 -0500, Lon Hohberger wrote: > So, the short answer to your question is, "Well, not yet, but, er, funny > that you should ask ..." > > On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 22:11 +0200, Eftychios Eftychiou wrote: > > Got a few questions regarding RHCS. Would be grateful if someone could > > answer them. > > > > 1. Fencing in a two node cluster according to the FAQ could lead to > > each node trying to fence each other resulting in total cluster > > blowup. The suggested solution of that problem was to use serialized > > fencing devices. Being new to *this* type of clustering, I had to delve into this matter too (see my other thread). As far as I understand, this so called STONITH behaviour is perfectly OK! As long as 1 of the two nodes is slightly faster [fencing the other] nothing is wrong. You end up with a 1-node cluster which has quorum and will run your services. Everything is better than accidentally having two nodes running the services. Regards, Klaas -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
