On Tuesday 01 August 2006 18:32, Stephen Willey wrote: > Robert Peterson wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > Yes, this is a problem with gfs_fsck. The problem is, it tries to > > allocate memory > > for bitmaps based on the size of the file system. The bitmap structures > > are used > > throughout the code, so they're not optional. I'll have to figure out > > how to > > do this a better way. Thanks for opening the bugzilla (200883). I'll > > work on it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Bob Peterson > > Red Hat Cluster Suite > > The fsck is now running after we added the 137Gb swap drive. It appears > to consistently chew about 4Gb of RAM (sometimes higher) but it is > working (for now). > > Any ballpark idea of how long it'll take to fsck a 45Tb FS? I know > that's a "how long is a piece of string" question, but are we talking > hours/days/weeks? > > Stephen > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster It took 55 hours for all 7 passes on my 1TB partition (with alot of files on it) . partition resided on raid 10 sata storage. Does anyone else have execution times for gfs_gsck ? -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
