Robert Peterson wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > Yes, this is a problem with gfs_fsck. The problem is, it tries to > allocate memory > for bitmaps based on the size of the file system. The bitmap structures > are used > throughout the code, so they're not optional. I'll have to figure out > how to > do this a better way. Thanks for opening the bugzilla (200883). I'll > work on it. > > Regards, > > Bob Peterson > Red Hat Cluster Suite The fsck is now running after we added the 137Gb swap drive. It appears to consistently chew about 4Gb of RAM (sometimes higher) but it is working (for now). Any ballpark idea of how long it'll take to fsck a 45Tb FS? I know that's a "how long is a piece of string" question, but are we talking hours/days/weeks? Stephen -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
