I filed a bug with redhat on this and it was a duplicate of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186125 Stephen David Teigland wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Stephen Willey wrote: >> Having looked into this a bit, it appears that gfs_fsck doesn't like >> large drives. >> >> It works fine on a 137Gb drive but fails instantly with the below >> symptoms on a 10Tb RAID. >> >> Is it still the case that GFS is not scalable to very large filesystems? > > It's probably more a case of no one ever even trying trying fsck on a fs > that large given how long it would probably take. > > Dave > -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
