Is the fs code closer to ext than to say xfs?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Teigland [mailto:teigland@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Mon May 15 08:23:42 2006
To: Stephen Willey
Cc: Daire Byrne; linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: gfs_fsck problems (not doingget_get_meta_buffer)
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Stephen Willey wrote:
> Having looked into this a bit, it appears that gfs_fsck doesn't like
> large drives.
>
> It works fine on a 137Gb drive but fails instantly with the below
> symptoms on a 10Tb RAID.
>
> Is it still the case that GFS is not scalable to very large filesystems?
It's probably more a case of no one ever even trying trying fsck on a fs
that large given how long it would probably take.
Dave
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
