On Wednesday 15 March 2006 14:45, Velu Erwan wrote: > Marc Grimme a écrit : > >Hello, > >we have some customers that have samba clusters with GFS running for a > > long time without problems. There are some things you need to take into > > account but nevertheless samba on GFS runs very well even when you export > > the same data via NFS. > >E.G. one customer runs a "active/active" Samba/NFS Cluster on GFS as ADS > >Member for about a year (up to 600 Users) without problems. > >I would say samba and GFS is a very nice combination. > >Regards Marc. > > This sounds to be done in a homedir approach but this doesn't sounds to > work when you share a directory on several samba servers. > I mean, there will be troubles if two users want to access to the same > file by using 2 different samba servers. > The samba team sounds to address this issue in the future samba 4.0. Right, because of that i wrote "active/active". It might work but I would accept the same problems to happen in special cases. > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Gruss / Regards, Marc Grimme Phone: +49-89 121 409-54 http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ ** ATIX - Ges. fuer Informationstechnologie und Consulting mbH Einsteinstr. 10 - 85716 Unterschleissheim - Germany -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
