On Jan 20, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
David Teigland wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Type Total Used Free use%
----------------------------------------------------
inodes 2697580 2697580 0 100%
metadata 104195 21410 82785 21%
data 290040505 23167 290017338 0%
Now 180M is nowhere near 11G! Am I reading something wrong? Why
am I getting different numbers?
Add the space used by the inode blocks. File/directory data is
stuffed into the inode block if it's under around 3500 bytes.
Ah...THAT's the piece of information I was missing! Now that you
mention it, I remember reading about that somewhere. I guess it just
didn't click.
Based on what I've gathered so far, that chart is showing inodes,
metadata, and data as a number of blocks, right? So to get disk usage,
I add up the used inode, metadata, and data blocks and multiply by
block
size (4K)?
That seems to show me a 1.1TB total with 10.5GB used, which sounds
about
right.
yes.
Also, to answer one of your earlier questions, metadata is file-system
specific data (directories, indirect blocks, etc).
brassow
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
