David Teigland wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: >>>> Type Total Used Free use% >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>> inodes 2697580 2697580 0 100% >>>> metadata 104195 21410 82785 21% >>>> data 290040505 23167 290017338 0% > >> Now 180M is nowhere near 11G! Am I reading something wrong? Why >> am I getting different numbers? > > Add the space used by the inode blocks. File/directory data is > stuffed into the inode block if it's under around 3500 bytes. Ah...THAT's the piece of information I was missing! Now that you mention it, I remember reading about that somewhere. I guess it just didn't click. Based on what I've gathered so far, that chart is showing inodes, metadata, and data as a number of blocks, right? So to get disk usage, I add up the used inode, metadata, and data blocks and multiply by block size (4K)? That seems to show me a 1.1TB total with 10.5GB used, which sounds about right. -- Bowie -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
