Hi Hirantha,
The fence device for nodeN has to be the ILO device that is used to
fence nodeN - i.e. the ILO device inside nodeN.
For the cluster.conf this means:
(...)
<clusternode name="nodeN" votes="1">
<fence>
<method name="1">
<device name="HPiLO_nodeN"/>
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
(...)
<fencedevices>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="hostname of ILO device inside nodeN"
login="ilouser" name="HPiLO_nodeN" passwd="ilopassword"/>
</fencedevices>
and so on...
I hope that helps,
Mark
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 10:20 +0600, Hirantha Wijayawardena wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> But I didn't get - the configuration is backwards!!
>
> I'm very new to RHCS but not for Linux Cluster and please help on this.
>
> As you know I have 2 fence devices each node has its own.
>
> Node1 has HPiLO_node1
> Node2 has HPiLO_node2
>
> So I configured as follows
>
> <clusternode name="node1" votes="1">
> <fence>
> <method name="1">
> <device name="HPiLO_node2"/>
> </method>
> </fence>
> </clusternode>
>
> <clusternode name="node2" votes="1">
> <fence>
> <method name="1">
> <device name="HPiLO_node1"/>
> </method>
> </fence>
> </clusternode>
>
> <fencedevices>
> <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.1"
> login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node1" passwd="RWE232WE"/>
> <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.2"
> login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node2"
> passwd="QWD31D4D"/>
> </fencedevices>
>
> Is this correct?
>
> And I will do what Dave suggests and let you guys know. Before that please
> advice me is my configuration on fence devices are correct.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> - Hirantha
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lon Hohberger [mailto:lhh@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:41 AM
> To: linux clustering
> Cc: Hirantha Wijayawardena
> Subject: Re: RHSCv4 2-node cluster hangs while
> startingfenced
>
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:37 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
>
> > > <clusternode name="node1" votes="1">
> > > <fence>
> > > <method name="1">
> > > <device name="HPiLO_node2"/>
> > > </method>
> > > </fence>
> > > </clusternode>
> >
> > > <clusternode name="node2" votes="1">
> > > <fence>
> > > <method name="1">
> > > <device name="HPiLO_node1"/>
> > > </method>
> > > </fence>
> > > </clusternode>
> >
> > > <fencedevices>
> > > <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.1"
> > > login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node1"
> passwd="RWE232WE"/>
> > > <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.2"
> > > login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node2"
> passwd="QWD31D4D"/>
> > > </fencedevices>
> >
> > I've never configured fence_ilo before, but you may want to check this.
> > You specify in node A's <fence> section how others will fence node A
> > (not how node A will fence another node). So, shouldn't node1 list
> > HPiLO_node1 as its fence device and node2 list HPiLO_node2?
>
> Yes, this is correct - the configuration looks backwards.
>
> -- Lon
>
> --
>
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Mark Hlawatschek <hlawatschek@xxxxxxx>
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
