Thanks all,
But I didn't get - the configuration is backwards!!
I'm very new to RHCS but not for Linux Cluster and please help on this.
As you know I have 2 fence devices each node has its own.
Node1 has HPiLO_node1
Node2 has HPiLO_node2
So I configured as follows
<clusternode name="node1" votes="1">
<fence>
<method name="1">
<device name="HPiLO_node2"/>
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
<clusternode name="node2" votes="1">
<fence>
<method name="1">
<device name="HPiLO_node1"/>
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
<fencedevices>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.1"
login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node1" passwd="RWE232WE"/>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.2"
login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node2"
passwd="QWD31D4D"/>
</fencedevices>
Is this correct?
And I will do what Dave suggests and let you guys know. Before that please
advice me is my configuration on fence devices are correct.
Thanks in advance
- Hirantha
-----Original Message-----
From: Lon Hohberger [mailto:lhh@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:41 AM
To: linux clustering
Cc: Hirantha Wijayawardena
Subject: Re: RHSCv4 2-node cluster hangs while
startingfenced
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:37 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> > <clusternode name="node1" votes="1">
> > <fence>
> > <method name="1">
> > <device name="HPiLO_node2"/>
> > </method>
> > </fence>
> > </clusternode>
>
> > <clusternode name="node2" votes="1">
> > <fence>
> > <method name="1">
> > <device name="HPiLO_node1"/>
> > </method>
> > </fence>
> > </clusternode>
>
> > <fencedevices>
> > <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.1"
> > login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node1"
passwd="RWE232WE"/>
> > <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.10.10.2"
> > login="Administrator" name="HPiLO_node2"
passwd="QWD31D4D"/>
> > </fencedevices>
>
> I've never configured fence_ilo before, but you may want to check this.
> You specify in node A's <fence> section how others will fence node A
> (not how node A will fence another node). So, shouldn't node1 list
> HPiLO_node1 as its fence device and node2 list HPiLO_node2?
Yes, this is correct - the configuration looks backwards.
-- Lon
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
