On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > +void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> > +{
> > + glock_hold(gl);
> > +}
> >
> > eh why?
On 9/5/05, David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You removed the comment stating exactly why, see below. If that's not a
> accepted technique in the kernel, say so and I'll be happy to change it
> here and elsewhere.
Is there a reason why users of gfs2_glock_hold() cannot use
glock_hold() directly?
Pekka
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
