On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> +void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> +{
> + glock_hold(gl);
> +}
>
> eh why?
You removed the comment stating exactly why, see below. If that's not a
accepted technique in the kernel, say so and I'll be happy to change it
here and elsewhere.
Thanks,
Dave
static inline void glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
{
gfs2_assert(gl->gl_sbd, atomic_read(&gl->gl_count) > 0);
atomic_inc(&gl->gl_count);
}
/**
* gfs2_glock_hold() - As glock_hold(), but suitable for exporting
* @gl: The glock to hold
*
*/
void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
{
glock_hold(gl);
}
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
