Re: GFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:18:48PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Aah, I see GFS2 does that too so no deadlocks here. Thanks.
Yep, no problem :)

> You, however, don't maintain the same level of data consistency when reads
> and writes are from other filesystems as they use ->nopage.
I'm not sure what you mean here...

> Fixing this requires a generic vma walk in every write() and read(), no?
> That doesn't seem such an hot idea which brings us back to using ->nopage
> for taking the locks (but now the deadlocks are back). 
Yeah if you look through mmap.c in ocfs2_fill_ctxt_from_buf() we do this...
Or am I misunderstanding what you mean?
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux