Re: GFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:57:43PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Surely avoiding them is preferred but how do you do that when you have to 
> mmap'd regions where userspace does memcpy()? The kernel won't much saying 
> in it until ->nopage. We cannot grab all the required locks in proper order 
> here because we don't know what size the buffer is. That's why I think lock 
> sorting won't work of all the cases and thus the problem needs to be taken 
> care of by the dlm. 
Hmm, well today in OCFS2 if you're not coming from read or write, the lock
is held only for the duration of ->nopage so I don't think we could get into
any deadlocks for that usage.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux