Indeed, that is what I meant. I'm looking at running OpenLDAP as a failover cluster service. I understand what was meant about db failures and how GFS won't help with that. Our LDAP directory is fairly simple and updates/changes are made very infrequently. I've never experienced a db failure but I won't discount that as a possible issue (that's what I have backups for. TSM, I love you). I'll take my chances and run it the way I'd planned with some failover testing before I go production. -- Ryan On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:40 -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 22:11 +1000, Adam Cassar wrote: > > We run openldap quite extensively here. In my experience, if slapd fails > > it is usually due to some backend db issue, and gfs will not help you > > with that. > > > > A master slave set up will be your best option. > > Right, I think he meant to run one without a slave as a failover cluster > service, not a multi-instance app running atop of GFS... > > *shrug* > > -- Lon > > > -- > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
