Re: Clustered LDAP, good or bad idea?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We run openldap quite extensively here. In my experience, if slapd fails it is usually due to some backend db issue, and gfs will not help you with that.

A master slave set up will be your best option.

Lon Hohberger wrote:

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 19:08 -0600, Ryan Thomson wrote:

I'm a bit concerned about failures since I can't test that properly in a
two-node cluster.

I suppose what I'm really asking is this: Is running LDAP as a cluster
service a particularly bad idea for any reason?


Not that I'm aware of.  I had one running a while for a reason which
I've since forgotten (I stopped it on 29-Mar-2005, and has never been
restarted).  However, that LDAP server was only for testing; I've never
run one in production.

-- Lon

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux