Re: Fencing Problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Forgue wrote:
> Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> 
> 
>>Data integrity requires that the remaining node knows for sure that the other
>>node has been removed from the cluster. Without that assurance your data is toast.
>>
> 
> 
> Would this be possible if GFS implemented an on-disk quota system?
> 

GFS does have quotas but I don't see what they have to do with fencing. If you
meant a "quorum disk" then the answer is "yes". But we don't have a quorum disk
facility.

-- 

patrick

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux