Rich Edelman wrote: > Ah, yes, I did set the two-node option to cman in > /etc/cluster/cluster.conf. > > Perhaps some documentation should be updated... But would it not be > better to have some kind of timeout value on the nodes when trying to > fence the others? Seems to me that in a two-node scenario, if one node > is repeatedly trying to fence the other, and after say 10 tries it > can't, it should just give up and assume it is the problem node. Then, > hopefully, everything else would go quite well when that node came back. > Data integrity requires that the remaining node knows for sure that the other node has been removed from the cluster. Without that assurance your data is toast. -- patrick -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
