Re: A few GFS newbie questions: journals, etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nate Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> 
>> Yes, as long as more than half the VMs were on the surviving node as
>> well...
>>
>> If exactly half of the nodes votes disappear, a quorum no longer
>> exists (except in the 2-node special case).  Suppose there were 4 VMs:
>>
>>   2 x 50 votes = 100 votes
>>     4 x 1 vote =   4 votes
>>          Total = 104 votes
>> ---------------------------
>> Need for quorum =  53 votes
> 
> 
> Is it possible to tweak the votes needed for quorum with
> 'expected_votes'? I've been playing with it a bit, and it seems to work.

Yes, you can force expected_votes to be an unreasonable low value. Personally I
set it to 1 on my single-machine Xen test cluster but then I don't care about
data corruption ;-)


> Really, in my case, as long as one of physical hosts is still up, I'd
> still like to have a quorum.
> 



-- 

patrick

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux