On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Lon Hohberger wrote:
(a) a totally asymmetric setup: one node having 21 votes, all others having 1. If the node with 21 votes goes down, everyone loses quorum though, and no one can access the file system.
Y'know, coming back to this.. instead of using gulm, would it be possible for me to set up a cluster where the physical nodes (4) have like 50 votes each, and the VM's have 1 vote each? That way, I could lose one of the physical nodes, and still have a quorum, right?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ | nate carlson | natecars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://www.natecarlson.com | | depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
