Ion Alberdi wrote:
I added this logs in find_root_by_ref:
resource_t
*
find_root_by_ref(resource_t **reslist, char
*ref)
{
resource_t
*curr;
int
x;
//MODIF
ION
clulog(LOG_NOTICE,"We are in find_root_by_ref we enter the
loop\n");
//MODIF
ION
list_do(reslist, curr)
{
//MODIF
ION
clulog(LOG_NOTICE,"%d\n",curr);
//MODIF
ION
if (curr->r_rule->rr_root ==
0){
//MODIF
ION
clulog(LOG_NOTICE,"curr->r_rule->rr_root ==
0\n");
//MODIF
ION
continue;
}
/*
This should be one operation - the primary
attr
is generally at the head of the
array.
*/
for (x = 0; curr->r_attrs &&
curr->r_attrs[x].ra_name;
x++)
{
if (!(curr->r_attrs[x].ra_flags &
RA_PRIMARY)){
//MODIF
ION
clulog(LOG_NOTICE,"!(curr->r_attrs[x].ra_flags &
RA_PRIMARY)\n");
//MODIF
ION
continue;
}
if (strcmp(ref,
curr->r_attrs[x].ra_value)){
//MODIF
ION
clulog(LOG_NOTICE,"strcmp(ref,
curr->r_attrs[x].ra_value)=true\n");
//MODIF
ION
continue;
}
return
curr;
}
} while (!list_done(reslist,
curr));
return
NULL;
}
what happens in gump:
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> find_root_by_ref
parameters:resources 134613668,groupname datamover
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> We are in
find_root_by_ref we enter the loop
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> 134642544
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> curr->r_rule->rr_root == 0
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> 134617456
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> find_root_by_ref in
groups.c returned res 134617456
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> res_exec in restree.c
returned rv 0
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> res_exec in restree.c
returned rv 0
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> _res_op_by_level in
restree.c returned rv 0
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> res_start in groups.c
returned ret 0
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> group_op in rg_state.c
returned ret 0
Jun 20 11:30:11 gump clurgmgrd[7231]: <notice> Service datamover started
what happens in buba:
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> find_root_by_ref
parameters:resources 134613668,groupname datamover
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> We are in
find_root_by_ref we enter the loop
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> 134616568
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> curr->r_rule->rr_root
== 0
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> find_root_by_ref in
groups.c returned res 0
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> group_op in rg_state.c
returned ret -1
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <warning> #68: Failed to start
datamover; return value: 1
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> Stopping service
datamover
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> find_root_by_ref
parameters:resources 134613668,groupname datamover
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> We are in
find_root_by_ref we enter the loop
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> 134616568
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> curr->r_rule->rr_root
== 0
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> find_root_by_ref in
groups.c returned res 0
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <crit> #12: RG datamover failed
to stop; intervention required
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <notice> Service datamover is
failed
Jun 20 11:31:29 buba clurgmgrd[10706]: <crit> #13: Service datamover
failed to stop cleanly
The reslist seems not to be the same in the two nodes,
I'll check my cluster.conf in my both nodes............
Sorry I'd better have waited before sending the previous mail:
the cluster.conf are identical.
So my question-> what does this lists represents, and what are the
files I have to check to see if there are identical
on my two nodes?
--
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster