On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:40:36PM +0200, Birger Wathne wrote: > Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra wrote: > > > > >depends, if you're just playing with it, and got HEAD working, then > >you're ok. If you actually want to use it in a production system then > >you should look into the RHEL4 or RHEL4U1 branches. > > > > I'm planning on going into production *very* soon. I am currently running > FC3 and the RHEL4 branch. Should I go for FC4 as soon as it gets released > and the FC4 branch instead? I can wait for that unless FC4 gets further > delayed. > > I am a bit weary... Whenever I stop my services and unmount filesystems to > do a gfs_fsck on them I get errors. Differing bitmaps, etc, etc. This is > with only one node in my cluster, and no heavy usage yet. Scares me a > little :-) Any comments? Is this normal? Critical? Is this code production > ready? If you could send the output of the fsck that you're seeing, I can probably tell you if it's an issue or not. Regards, -- AJ Lewis Voice: 612-638-0500 Red Hat Inc. E-Mail: alewis@xxxxxxxxxx One Main Street SE, Suite 209 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Current GPG fingerprint = D9F8 EDCE 4242 855F A03D 9B63 F50C 54A8 578C 8715 Grab the key at: http://people.redhat.com/alewis/gpg.html or one of the many keyservers out there...
Attachment:
pgpyESYFqzz1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
