On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:09:11AM -0500, Nate Carlson wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Birger Wathne wrote: > >The latest snapshot of the head branch is very unstable and internally > >inconsistent at the moment > > > >Get the latest snapshot of the RHEL4 branch instead. > >cvs -d :pserver:cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvs/cluster checkout -r RHEL4 > >cluster > > I'm a newbie user; just got my first test cluster set up over the weekend. > I'm currently running HEAD, as it was the only one that would cleanly > compile for me with a 2.6.11.10 kernel. Should I be looking at hacking the > RHEL4 branch up instead? Is that more stable for long-term use? depends, if you're just playing with it, and got HEAD working, then you're ok. If you actually want to use it in a production system then you should look into the RHEL4 or RHEL4U1 branches. -- Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra The church is near but the road is icy; the bar is far away but I will walk carefully. -- Russian Proverb
Attachment:
pgpbEuyyzinzv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
