-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > >>while running an automated test to verify library integrity and consistency, >>I noticed that libgulm.a was not an ar archive as it is supposed to be and >>that libgulm.so.$(RELEASE_MAJOR) amd libgulm.so where not symlinks, but >>plain copy of the library. >> >>I am not sure if this was just an overlook or if it was intended to be >>that way. >> >>The following patch does what I think is the right thing. >> >>Please review before applying! > > > Um, wild guess, but this is on CVS HEAD? > assuming so, since that's the only branch where I forgot to fix the > symlinks to the .so > (Now that there are four branches, it would be nice if you could say > which branch your patch is on.) Yes sorry.. I forgot about that, but it was against CVS head. I will take more care next time Fabio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCZ7dmhCzbekR3nhgRApP9AJ4/nZrHa0+KJS/iQylN0dUmRzLMDQCePSMj CsdI5XqkyBdPHCUzPDh7RjU= =knYZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
