Re: [PATCH] libgulm not hadled correctly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> while running an automated test to verify library integrity and consistency,
> I noticed that libgulm.a was not an ar archive as it is supposed to be and
> that libgulm.so.$(RELEASE_MAJOR) amd libgulm.so where not symlinks, but
> plain copy of the library.
> 
> I am not sure if this was just an overlook or if it was intended to be
> that way.
> 
> The following patch does what I think is the right thing.
> 
> Please review before applying!

Um, wild guess, but this is on CVS HEAD?
assuming so, since that's the only branch where I forgot to fix the
symlinks to the .so
(Now that there are four branches, it would be nice if you could say
which branch your patch is on.)

I'll get that checked in.

As for using ld instead of ar to build the .a, well I copied that from
somewhere... i thought from the magma libs, but I see that they are using
ar, so I duno... I'll switch that too then.

Thanks for the patch.

-- 
Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
Oh yeah, anybody got an ethernet card to fit my night table?

Attachment: pgpCv3CSvPK1c.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux