On Monday 23 August 2004 14:14, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Just read the license. > > > > http://www.taniwha.org/bitkeeper.html > > Wow, an entire treatise predicated on proving that BitKeeper is not > Free Software, when noone from BitMover ever claimed it was. Sources.redhat.com not only consists entirely of free software, but shows leadership to the free software community. We[1] are interested in advancing not only our own projects, but other open source projects such as Subversion and Arch. [1] Presumptively speaking for what I presume is the majority. Regards, Daniel
