Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of clustering software components including GFS <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:14:11 -0700
In-reply-to: <200408231402.22863.phillips@redhat.com>
Organization: Back To Basics Network Management
References: <200408231143.11372.phillips@redhat.com> <1093280841.12873.43.camel@cherrybomb.pdx.osdl.net> <200408231402.22863.phillips@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of clustering software components including GFS <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)

Daniel Phillips wrote:

Just read the license.
http://www.taniwha.org/bitkeeper.html

Wow, an entire treatise predicated on proving that BitKeeper is not Free Software, when noone from BitMover ever claimed it was.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
  - From: Daniel Phillips

References:
- [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
  - From: Daniel Phillips
- Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
  - From: John Cherry
- Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
  - From: Daniel Phillips

Prev by Date: Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
Next by Date: Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
Previous by thread: Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
Next by thread: Re: [Linux-cluster] Subversion?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux